The former Senate President Bukola Saraki has been accused by EFCC of withdrawing N12bn in cash from the Kwara State Government treasury while he was governor of the state between 2003 and 2011, he allegedly used the money to offset an N1.36bn bank loan he used to acquire choice properties located at 15, 15A, 17, 17A and on Macdonald Road (four flats), Ikoyi, Lagos, EFCC is thus asking the court to grant the commission leave to confiscate the properties.
The anti-corruption agency has therefore asked Justice Taiwo Taiwo of the Federal High Court, Abuja, to rescind the ex parte order preventing the commission from investigating and prosecuting Saraki.
READ ALSO: Amosun Stockpiling Arms And Ammunitions, Has Private Armoury – Ogun APC Alleges And Demands For A Probe
The EFCC, in it’s counter-affidavit deposed to by Ojilibo Stanley, the agency said they had established a case of money laundering, criminal breach of trust and conspiracy by the immediate past Senate President, according to EFCC, between 2005 and 2006, Saraki took loans worth N1.36bn from the Guaranty Trust Bank and Intercontinental Bank (now Access Bank), through his companies.
The commission said that they have evidence showing that, in a bid to offset the loan, Saraki as governor of Kwara state, diverted N100m every month from the coffers of the state.
The EFCC said a sequel to the letter Saraki wrote dated March 8, 2005, to Guaranty Trust Bank requesting a N200m loan to finance the acquisition of the properties on March 24, 2005, GTB approved the loan to partly finance the purchase of the properties.
The anti-graft agency said on October 11, 2006, another personal loan of N380m was granted to Saraki by GTB to partly finance the acquisition of properties located at 17 and 17A Macdonald Road, Ikoyi.
The commission further claimed that on January 30, 2007, a personal loan of N380m was again granted to the former governor to partly finance the same properties.
It said on April 28, 2009, another personal loan of N400m was obtained by Saraki to develop the same properties.
The affidavit stated, “The personal loans used to acquire the properties were later liquidated with the proceeds of the applicant’s (Saraki’s) criminal breach of trust or misappropriation of funds of the Kwara State Government.
“The applicant (Saraki) procured one Abdul Adama who was his personal member of staff to receive cash from then-Controller of Finance and Account of Government House, Kwara State, Mr Isiaka Kareem, on a monthly basis, the sum of N100m.
“While the applicant was the governor of Kwara State, the total sum of N12bn was withdrawn in cash from the Kwara State Government House’s account domiciled in Zenith Bank.”
The EFCC denied being controlled by the All Progressives Congress, adding that the fresh investigation of Saraki was different from the ones related to the one conducted by the Code of Conduct Bureau.
Saraki had stated in an affidavit he deposed to in support of the origination motion that acting EFCC Chairman, Ibrahim Magu, was on a revenge mission because of the role he (Saraki) played in blocking his confirmation as EFCC chairman.
He said, “Apart from the instigation by my political adversaries, my close contacts have confirmed to me that the 4th respondent (EFCC) renewed its harassment as a way of punishing me for the decision of the Senate not to clear acting chairman of the EFCC, Alhaji Ibrahim Magu, to be appointed as the substantive chairman of the commission.”
Saraki said the EFCC was also pained because he was in charge of the Senate when the legislative arm of government ensured the creation of the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit, NFIU, to Magu’s annoyance.
He had also alleged that he was being hounded by the anti-graft body because he emerged as the President of the Senate against the wishes of certain elements in the APC in 2015.
Saraki said the aggrieved elements in the APC were using the EFCC agency to harass him.
He argued that the allegations leveled against him were not new as he had been charged before the CCT and emerged victorious.
He said he was already a successful businessman before becoming governor in 2003 and therefore asked the court to rule that his probe was a breach of his fundamental human rights.
The case has been adjourned till July 2, 2019.