A warrant was issued on the Oluwo of Iwo, Oba Adewale Akanbi by a Magistrate Court, sitting in Osogbo, the Osun State capital. This decision followed the monarch’s unwillingness to appear in court in a case filed by the ruler of Oluwo of Iwo Oke, Oba Kadiri Adeoye. It was in the news last few days that the paramount ruler of Iwoland, Oba Akanbi, was dragged before the court by Oba Kadiri Adeoye the Oluwo of Iwo Oke, for alleged criminal attacks.
According to lawyers, the bench warrant implied that Oba Akanbi should be arrested and brought before the court at its next court sitting date.
Although the Oluwo of Iwo represented in court on by his lawyer
, Mr Olaide Yekeen, Magistrate Olusola Aluko went ahead to issue the bench warrant despite the application for a stay of proceeding, a notice of preliminary objection and a notice of appeal filed before the court.
READ ALSO: Bill Gates Buys Nature Friendly hydrogen-powered Megayacht
Oba Akanbi’s lawyer, told the court that his client had several applications before the court, adding that the notice of preliminary objection, which bordered on competence and jurisdiction of the court, should be heard first before the substantive application. He said Section 19 (1) of the Magistrate Court Laws highlighted the jurisdiction of the court, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter.
“When there is an application challenging the jurisdiction of the court, such application should be taken first. We are vehemently and seriously challenging the competence and jurisdiction of this court, and our applications should be taken first,” he said.
But counsel for the applicant, Soji Oyetayo, in his submission, told the court that it made an order which the Oluwo had refused to comply with.
“I urge the court to jettison the applications. They have to obey the earlier order of the court. The first respondent should be in court today, but he is not in flagrant disobedience of the court order,” he said.
The magistrate, in his ruling, agreed with the respondent (the Oluwo) on the issue of jurisdiction but said the notice of appeal was not ripe.
He said, “The court-mandated the first respondent to appear in court. He has violated the court order of the last adjourned date. I hereby issue a bench warrant against him.”